PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
^IXIC vs. QQQM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^IXIC vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.89%
10.28%
^IXIC
QQQM

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^IXIC achieves a 25.18% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 22.73% return.


^IXIC

YTD

25.18%

1M

1.63%

6M

11.89%

1Y

33.03%

5Y (annualized)

17.18%

10Y (annualized)

14.88%

QQQM

YTD

22.73%

1M

1.12%

6M

10.28%

1Y

30.52%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Key characteristics


^IXICQQQM
Sharpe Ratio1.891.76
Sortino Ratio2.502.35
Omega Ratio1.341.32
Calmar Ratio2.522.25
Martin Ratio9.398.21
Ulcer Index3.53%3.72%
Daily Std Dev17.55%17.41%
Max Drawdown-77.93%-35.05%
Current Drawdown-2.63%-2.75%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between ^IXIC and QQQM is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

^IXIC vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 1.89, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.001.891.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.502.35
The chart of Omega ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.801.001.201.401.601.341.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 2.52, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.522.25
The chart of Martin ratio for ^IXIC, currently valued at 9.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.009.398.21
^IXIC
QQQM

The current ^IXIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^IXIC and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.89
1.76
^IXIC
QQQM

Drawdowns

^IXIC vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^IXIC drawdown since its inception was -77.93%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^IXIC and QQQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-14.00%-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-2.63%
-2.75%
^IXIC
QQQM

Volatility

^IXIC vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

NASDAQ Composite (^IXIC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 5.78% and 5.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.78%
5.62%
^IXIC
QQQM